<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>frankylicious &#187; Too Much Thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frankylicio.us/tag/too-much-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frankylicio.us</link>
	<description>Geekiness with Attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:23:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Is Google Wave&#8217;s Live Chat Feature Contra-productive?</title>
		<link>http://frankylicio.us/whatever/is-google-waves-live-chat-feature-contra-productive/</link>
		<comments>http://frankylicio.us/whatever/is-google-waves-live-chat-feature-contra-productive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>franky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Whatever]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOLWUT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nerds United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Too Much Thinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frankylicio.us/?p=1271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nerds united are all up in hoops about Google Wave&#8217;s live chat feature. I actually thought that it was interesting, fun and nice nostalgic touch to the oh so modern Wave. Chatting on Wave is like talking to an overcurious mind reader. On a conventional IM, you only see what other people say once they]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nerds united are all up in hoops about Google Wave&#8217;s live chat feature. I actually thought that it was interesting, fun and nice nostalgic touch to the <em>oh so modern Wave</em>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Chatting on Wave is like talking to an overcurious mind reader. On a conventional IM, you only see what other people say once they hit Enter. (True, the IM program will tell your partner whether or not you&#8217;re typing, but this is too little information to get embarrassed about.) On Wave, every misspelling, half-formed sentence, and ill-advised stab at sarcasm is transmitted instantly to the other person. This behavior is so corrosive to normal conversation that you&#8217;d think it was some kind of bug. In fact, it&#8217;s a feature—indeed, it&#8217;s one of the Wave team&#8217;s proudest accomplishments. When Google first unveiled Wave this spring, the program&#8217;s inventors hailed real-time typing as a way to mimic real-life conversations online. Because you can see what your chat partner is trying to say before she&#8217;s finished saying it, you can start replying immediately, making conversations much faster, Wave&#8217;s proponents argue. In practice, though, live typing either slows conversations to a crawl or renders them anodyne. Because you&#8217;ve got to second-guess every word you put down, you find yourself agonizing over the keyboard. (Farhad Manjoo <a href="http://slate.com/id/2232311">for Slate</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>More than anything else, the live chat feature did not restrict me but made me feel happy, happy because I had already lived the Wave. Back in our days live chatting was really popular. We called it <a href="http://www.icq.com/">ICQ</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://frankylicio.us/whatever/is-google-waves-live-chat-feature-contra-productive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

